Data Protection & Privacy

U.S. Alaska Personal Information Protection Act (AK PIPA)

Alaska PIPA (AS 45.48) framework badge
Summarize with
ClaudeChatGPTPerplexityGoogle AI Mode
In this article
At a Glance
Alaska Personal Information Protection Act (AS 45.48)
  • Classification
    Category
    Data Protection & Privacy
    Domain
    Privacy
    Framework Family
    Global Privacy Regulations
  • Regulatory Context
    Type
    Regulation
    Legal Instrument
    Law
    Sector
    Cross-Sector
    Industry
    Cross-Industry
  • Region / Publisher
    Region
    North America
    Region Detail
    Alaska
    Publisher
    Alaska State Legislature
  • Versioning
    Version
    2008 (AS 45.48, Ch. 92 SLA 08)
    Effective Date
    July 1, 2009
    Issue Date
    June 13, 2008
  • Adoption
    Adoption Model
    Regulatory Compliance
    Implementation Complexity
    Medium
  • Official Reference
License Information

License included / downloadable: Yes

AS 45.48 is published by the Alaska Legislature at akleg.gov and is free to read and download. The statute text is not reproduced on this page.

Framework text is licensed by its publisher and is included only where stated above.

Official Resources
Alaska Personal Information Protection Act (AK PIPA) Full Text
Provides the complete legislative text of the Alaska Personal Information Protection Act.
CCN-STIC 825 — ENS and ISO/IEC 27001 certifications guide
The CCN-CERT guide (800 series) on how ISO/IEC 27001 certification relates to conformity with the Esquema Nacional de Seguridad.
Key takeaways
  • Alaska's Personal Information Protection Act (AS 45.48) requires covered entities to notify residents when their personal information is breached.
  • It applies to anyone doing business in Alaska, state and local agencies, and persons with more than 10 employees.
  • Enacted in 2008 and in force since July 1, 2009, it also limits Social Security number use and requires careful record disposal.
  • Notice must go out in the most expeditious time possible; no fixed number of days is set.
  • Civil penalties for failing to notify are up to $500 per resident, capped at $50,000.

Overview

The Alaska Personal Information Protection Act (AS 45.48) is a state law that requires a person doing business in Alaska, a state or local government agency, or a person with more than 10 employees to notify Alaska residents when their personal information is breached. Enacted in 2008 and in force since 1 July 2009, it also limits the use of Social Security numbers, requires careful disposal of records, and gives residents a credit security freeze.

The chapter has several parts: breach disclosure (AS 45.48.010 to .090), security freeze (.100 to .290), Social Security numbers (.400 to .480), disposal of records (.500 to .590), factual declarations of innocence after identity theft (.600 to .690), and truncation of card information (.750). A non-governmental entity that fails to give breach notice commits an unfair or deceptive act under the Alaska Consumer Protection Act, with a civil penalty of up to $500 per resident not notified, capped at $50,000. The Department of Administration enforces the breach rules against governmental agencies.

Entities implement the act by running an incident process that decides quickly whether personal information was acquired, notifies residents in the most expeditious time possible, informs the nationwide credit reporting agencies when more than 1,000 residents are notified, and documents any no-harm determination for five years.

Why does it matter?

The act sets no fixed number of days for notice. The test is the most expeditious time possible and without unreasonable delay, so the incident record is what shows an entity acted in time.

Key benefits include:

  • A clear notice rule

Notify each affected resident when personal information was acquired without authority, unless a documented no-harm determination applies.

  • A defined trigger

Personal information is a name combined with a Social Security number, driver's license or state ID number, account or card number, or a password or access code, so teams can scope the data that triggers notice.

  • A documented no-harm route

A written determination that harm is not reasonably likely, sent to the Attorney General and kept for five years, can remove the duty to notify residents.

  • Clear roles for processors

An information recipient that does not own the data must notify the information distributor immediately and cooperate, so the owner can notify residents.

  • Bounded penalties

Civil penalties for failing to notify are up to $500 per resident not notified, capped at $50,000.

How does it work?

Breach disclosure applies when a covered person owns or licenses personal information on an Alaska resident and the security of the system holding it is breached. A breach is unauthorized acquisition, or a reasonable belief of it, that compromises security, confidentiality, or integrity. Acquisition includes photocopying and other paper-based methods, so paper records count. A law enforcement agency may ask for a delay if notice would interfere with a criminal investigation (AS 45.48.020).

Notice goes by written document, or by electronic means when that is the usual channel. If notice would cost more than $150,000, the class exceeds 300,000 residents, or contact details are missing, the entity may use email, website posting, and notice to major statewide media (AS 45.48.030). When more than 1,000 residents are notified, the nationwide consumer credit reporting agencies must be told the timing, distribution, and content of the notices, unless the entity is subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (AS 45.48.040).

In SmartSuite, Privacy Management holds the data inventory and assessments, and Workflow Orchestration runs the breach decision, resident notice, and credit reporting agency steps with owners and dates.

Key Elements

  • Breach of the security (AS 45.48.090)

Unauthorized acquisition, or a reasonable belief of unauthorized acquisition, of personal information that compromises its security, confidentiality, or integrity. Good-faith acquisition by an employee or agent for a legitimate purpose is not a breach if the information is not misused or further disclosed (AS 45.48.050).

  • Personal information (AS 45.48.090)

An individual's first name or initial and last name combined with a Social Security number, driver's license or state ID number, an account, credit, or debit card number (plus any personal code needed to use it), or passwords and access codes for financial accounts. Encrypted or redacted data is outside the definition unless the encryption key was acquired.

  • Notice and the no-harm determination (AS 45.48.010)

Notice is due in the most expeditious time possible and without unreasonable delay. Notice to residents is not required if, after investigation and written notice to the Attorney General, the covered person determines harm is not reasonably likely. The determination is documented in writing and kept for five years.

  • Distributors and recipients (AS 45.48.070)

An information recipient that does not own the personal information is not required to give resident notice but must notify the information distributor immediately after discovering a breach and cooperate. The distributor then complies as if the breach occurred in its own system.

  • Social Security numbers (AS 45.48.400 to .480)

A person may not make a Social Security number available to the general public, print it on an access card, require it over an unsecured internet connection, or print it on mailed material except as allowed. Requesting or collecting it is restricted, with listed exceptions. Knowing violations carry a civil penalty of up to $3,000.

  • Disposal of records (AS 45.48.500 to .590)

A business or governmental agency disposing of records with personal information must take all reasonable measures to protect against unauthorized access or use, and must adopt written policies and procedures for destruction and disposal. A knowing violation carries a civil penalty of up to $3,000, and a damaged individual may sue for actual economic damages.

  • Security freeze and identity theft (AS 45.48.100 to .290, .600 to .690)

A consumer may place a security freeze on a credit report, and the agency must place it within five business days of a request with proper identification. A victim of identity theft may petition the superior court for a determination of factual innocence.

What does it cover?

The act applies to a person doing business in Alaska, a state or local governmental agency other than the judicial branch, and a person with more than 10 employees that owns or licenses personal information that includes information on an Alaska resident. The breach rules cover personal information in any form. A person who accepts credit or debit cards may not print more than the last four digits of the card number or the expiration date on a point-of-sale receipt (AS 45.48.750).

What are its objectives?

The act sets out what covered entities must do and what residents can rely on.

Notify each affected Alaska resident of a breach in the most expeditious time possible.

Document and keep for five years any determination that harm is not reasonably likely.

Notify the nationwide consumer credit reporting agencies when more than 1,000 residents are notified.

Dispose of records containing personal information with reasonable measures and written policies.

Give residents a credit security freeze and a route to a factual-innocence determination after identity theft.

Framework in Context

AS 45.48 has no general security-program requirement; its security duty is limited to record disposal (AS 45.48.500). Entities subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act are excused from the credit reporting agency notice (AS 45.48.040). Organizations that operate in several states and under several frameworks map the Alaska duties to a single incident and disposal process.

Common Framework Mappings

Alaska's duties overlap with the frameworks below, which lets one incident and disposal process serve several regimes.

Mapped frameworks include:

CCPA/CPRA

CIS Controls v8.1

GDPR

GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

ISO 27001:2022

ISO 27701

NIST CSF 2.0

NIST 800-53 Rev.5

PCI DSS 4.0.1

SOC 2

SMARTSUITE

How SmartSuite Supports AK PIPA

SmartSuite provides the system for managing controls, evidence, mappings, assessments, and reporting.

Use Privacy Management to keep the inventory of personal data that triggers notice, and Workflow Orchestration to run the breach decision and notice steps.

Personal information inventory

Record where names combined with Social Security, license, account, card, or access-code data are stored, using Privacy Management data inventories.

Breach decision record

Capture the acquisition assessment, the no-harm determination, and the written notice to the Attorney General, with five-year retention tracked.

Notice workflow

Run resident notice, substitute notice, and the credit reporting agency step for more than 1,000 residents as tracked tasks with owners and dates.

Disposal and Social Security number controls

Track written disposal policies, destruction vendors and due diligence, and the controls that restrict Social Security number requests and use.

Vendor and recipient duties

Record which vendors are information recipients that must notify you immediately, using Third Party Risk Management.

Reporting

Use Enterprise Reporting to show open incidents, time to notice, and disposal control status.

Related frameworks

CCPA/CPRA

The CCPA, as amended by the CPRA, gives California residents rights to know, delete, correct and opt out, and is enforced by the California Privacy Protection Agency.

GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

The GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) requires non-bank financial institutions under FTC jurisdiction to run a written information security program and report large breaches to the FTC.

ISO 27001:2022

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 specifies requirements for an information security management system: Clauses 4 to 10, risk treatment, the Statement of Applicability and 93 Annex A controls.

MA 201 CMR 17

Massachusetts 201 CMR 17.00 requires anyone that owns or licenses a resident's personal information to keep a written information security program with the 17.03 and 17.04 safeguards.

NY SHIELD

The New York SHIELD Act requires any holder of a New York resident's private information to keep reasonable safeguards (GBL 899-bb) and give breach notice within thirty days (GBL 899-aa).

NIST Privacy Framework v1.0

The NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 is a voluntary tool for managing privacy risk: five Functions, 18 Categories, 100 Subcategories, Profiles and four Implementation Tiers.

NIST 800-53 Rev.5

NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 is the NIST catalog of security and privacy controls in 20 families, mandatory for federal systems under OMB A-130 and FISMA; Release 5.2.0 issued August 27, 2025.

VCDPA

The Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (Va. Code § 59.1-575) gives consumers rights over personal data and sets controller duties the Attorney General enforces, since January 1, 2023.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions For U.S. Alaska Personal Information Protection Act (AK PIPA)

No fixed number of days. Notice must go out in the most expeditious time possible and without unreasonable delay, except where a law enforcement agency determines that notice would interfere with a criminal investigation (AS 45.48.010 and .020).

A covered person that owns or licenses personal information that includes information on an Alaska resident: a person doing business in Alaska, a state or local government agency other than the judicial branch, or a person with more than 10 employees. An information recipient that does not own the data must notify the information distributor immediately instead.

An individual's name (first name or initial and last name) combined with a Social Security number, a driver's license or state ID number, an account, credit, or debit card number, or passwords and access codes for financial accounts. Encrypted data is outside the definition unless the encryption key was acquired.

Yes, in one case. After an appropriate investigation and written notice to the Attorney General, the covered person may determine that there is no reasonable likelihood of harm. The determination must be documented in writing and kept for five years.

A non-governmental entity that fails to give breach notice commits an unfair or deceptive act under the Alaska Consumer Protection Act, with a civil penalty of up to $500 per resident not notified and a total cap of $50,000. Knowing violations of the Social Security number or record disposal rules carry civil penalties of up to $3,000, and affected individuals may sue for actual economic damages.

Put this framework to work in SmartSuite

Manage controls, risks, evidence, and audits in one platform designed for modern governance, risk, and compliance.