- ClassificationCategoryRisk ManagementDomainRisk ManagementFramework FamilyCOSO
- Regulatory ContextTypeControl FrameworkLegal InstrumentFrameworkSectorCross-SectorIndustryCross-Industry
- Region / PublisherRegionNorth AmericaRegion DetailUnited StatesPublisherCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)
- VersioningVersionInternal Control: Integrated Framework (2013), five components and 17 principles; supersedes the 1992 frameworkEffective DateMay 14, 2013 (1992 framework superseded December 15, 2014)Issue DateMay 14, 2013
- AdoptionAdoption ModelRegulatory ComplianceImplementation ComplexityHigh
- Official ReferenceOpen Link in New TabSource
License included / downloadable: No
COSO publishes a free executive summary and FAQ. The full Framework and Appendices are a paid publication from COSO, and COSO asks for a copyright permission request to reprint or use portions. The framework text is not included with the platform.
Framework text is licensed by its publisher and is included only where stated above.
- COSO Internal Control (2013) defines internal control and sets five components and 17 principles for designing, operating, and assessing it.
- Issued May 14, 2013, it superseded the 1992 framework on December 15, 2014.
- Public companies commonly use it as the ICFR framework for section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
- The Framework prescribes no specific controls; management judges whether each component and relevant principle is present and functioning.
- SmartSuite SOX Management and Compliance Management hold the controls, testing, and deficiencies behind management's ICFR assessment.
Overview
COSO's Internal Control: Integrated Framework (2013) defines internal control and sets out five components and 17 principles for designing, operating and assessing it. The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) issued it on May 14, 2013, and it superseded the 1992 original on December 15, 2014. Public companies commonly use it as the control framework for the assessment of internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) required by section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
COSO defines internal control as a process, effected by an entity's board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving objectives relating to operations, reporting and compliance. The Framework applies to entities of every size and type, including for-profit, not-for-profit and government bodies. COSO is a private-sector initiative, and the Framework is guidance rather than law.
For SOX purposes, management evaluates ICFR each year against a suitable, recognized control framework (17 CFR 240.13a-15(c)), and in an integrated audit the auditor must use the same framework (PCAOB AS 2201, paragraph .05). The Framework itself does not prescribe specific controls. Management judges whether each component and relevant principle is present and functioning and whether the five components operate together.
Why does it matter?
The Framework gives management, boards and auditors one shared test of whether internal control is effective. It names the components, the 17 principles that make them concrete and the point at which a deficiency prevents a conclusion of effectiveness, which is why auditors and public companies use it as their ICFR criteria.
Key benefits include:
- A defined test of effectiveness
Each of the five components and relevant principles must be present and functioning, and the components must operate together. A major deficiency in any of these means the organization cannot conclude that internal control is effective.
- Principles make gaps visible
The 2013 edition turned concepts implicit in 1992 into 17 stated principles, so management can see what is covered and what is missing in its documentation.
- More than financial reporting
Three categories of objectives apply: operations, reporting and compliance. Reporting now includes internal and external reporting and financial and non-financial reporting.
- Fraud and technology are named
Principle 8 requires the organization to consider the potential for fraud when assessing risks, and principle 11 requires general control activities over technology.
- Accepted by auditors
PCAOB standards describe the COSO framework as suitable and available for management's annual assessment, and the audit report templates cite it as an example of control criteria.
How does it work?
The Framework is often drawn as a cube. The three categories of objectives are the columns, the five components are the rows, and the entity's structure (operating units, legal entities and other) is the third dimension. All 17 principles apply to operations, reporting and compliance objectives, and COSO says an entity can achieve effective internal control by applying all of them.
"Present" means a component or principle exists in the design and implementation of the system. "Functioning" means it continues to exist in operation. COSO also lists limitations that prevent absolute assurance: the suitability of objectives, faulty human judgment, human error, management override, collusion and external events. Points of focus support judgment but are not a checklist.
In a SOX 404 assessment, management assesses its controls and the auditor applies PCAOB AS 2201. The auditor uses a top-down approach that starts at the financial statement level and entity-level controls (paragraph .21). If one or more material weaknesses exist, ICFR cannot be considered effective (paragraph .02). A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination, with a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis (Appendix A, .A7).
Key Elements
- Control Environment (principles 1 to 5)
Commitment to integrity and ethical values, board independence and oversight, structures and authorities, commitment to competence, and accountability. The board and senior management set the tone at the top.
- Risk Assessment (principles 6 to 9)
Specifying objectives clearly, identifying and analyzing risks, considering the potential for fraud, and identifying and assessing changes that could significantly affect internal control. Risk is the possibility that an event will occur and adversely affect achievement of objectives.
- Control Activities (principles 10 to 12)
Selecting and developing control activities that mitigate risk to acceptable levels, general controls over technology, and deploying controls through policies and procedures. Segregation of duties is typically built in.
- Information and Communication (principles 13 to 15)
Using relevant, quality information, communicating internally, including objectives and responsibilities for internal control, and communicating with external parties on matters affecting internal control.
- Monitoring Activities (principles 16 and 17)
Ongoing and separate evaluations to ascertain whether the components are present and functioning, and timely evaluation and communication of deficiencies to those responsible for corrective action, including senior management and the board.
What does it cover?
The Framework applies to any entity and at the level of the entity, an operating unit or a function. Its operations, reporting and compliance objectives are broader than financial reporting. For SOX 404, the relevant scope is internal control over financial reporting: management's report under 404(a) in each annual report, and an auditor attestation under 404(b), which does not apply to emerging growth companies or to issuers that are neither large accelerated nor accelerated filers (15 U.S.C. 7262).
What are its objectives?
The Framework sets out what an effective system of internal control requires and gives management a principles-based basis for judgment.
Provide reasonable assurance of achieving operations, reporting and compliance objectives.
Show how the five components and 17 principles must be present and functioning and operate together.
Apply internal control at the entity, operating unit and function levels.
Extend reporting objectives to non-financial and internal reporting.
Support a stronger focus on anti-fraud measures in risk assessment.
Help organizations remove ineffective, redundant or inefficient controls.
Framework in Context
COSO also issued the Internal Control over External Financial Reporting Compendium and the Illustrative Tools for Assessing Effectiveness alongside the Framework, and later guidance on internal control over sustainability reporting (2023), robotic process automation (2024) and generative AI (2026). Its Enterprise Risk Management framework is a separate publication, and neither supersedes the other. The 1992 original has been superseded.
Common Framework Mappings
Organizations map COSO Internal Control to risk, control and assurance frameworks to align control objectives, evidence and testing across audit and compliance programs.
Mapped frameworks include:
COBIT 2019
COSO ERM 2017
ISO 31000:2018
ISO 27001:2022
NIST CSF 2.0
NIST 800-37 Rev.2
SOX
SOC 1
How SmartSuite Supports COSO Internal Control
SmartSuite provides the system for managing controls, evidence, mappings, assessments, and reporting.
Use SOX Management and Compliance Management records to hold the controls, testing and deficiencies behind management's ICFR assessment, and Internal Audit Management to plan the testing and report findings against the five components and 17 principles.
Control Environment Records
Record board oversight, structures, authorities, competence commitments and accountability as the evidence for principles 1 to 5.
Objectives and Risk Assessment
Link each objective to its risks, including fraud risk and significant changes, and to the controls that address them (principles 6 to 9).
Control Activities and Technology Controls
Document control activities, the policies and procedures behind them, and general controls over technology (principles 10 to 12).
Information and Communication Evidence
Keep the information sources, internal communications of control responsibilities and external communications that support internal control (principles 13 to 15).
Monitoring and Deficiency Tracking
Schedule ongoing and separate evaluations and log deficiencies with owners, remediation and escalation to management and the board (principles 16 and 17).
Principle-Level Effectiveness Reporting
Report whether each component and principle is present and functioning, with open deficiencies, for management and audit committee review.
Related frameworks

COBIT 2019 is ISACA's framework for governing and managing enterprise IT, with 40 objectives in five domains, six governance principles and 11 design factors.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 specifies requirements for an information security management system: Clauses 4 to 10, risk treatment, the Statement of Applicability and 93 Annex A controls.

NIST CSF 2.0 (CSWP 29, February 26, 2024) is the voluntary cybersecurity framework with six Functions including Govern, 22 Categories, 106 Subcategories, Profiles and Tiers.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 is the NIST catalog of security and privacy controls in 20 families, mandatory for federal systems under OMB A-130 and FISMA; Release 5.2.0 issued August 27, 2025.

PCI DSS v4.0.1 (June 2024) is the current Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard: twelve requirements, two validation approaches and the dates that retired v4.0.

SOC 1 is the AICPA examination, under AT-C section 320, of a service organization's controls relevant to user entities' internal control over financial reporting, reported for user auditors.
Frequently Asked Questions For COSO Internal Control–Integrated Framework (2013)
The 2013 edition, issued May 14, 2013, keeps the 1992 definition of internal control and the five components, and adds 17 principles that formalize concepts implicit in the original. It also broadens reporting objectives to non-financial and internal reporting. COSO considered the 1992 framework superseded as of December 15, 2014.
Control Environment (principles 1 to 5), Risk Assessment (6 to 9), Control Activities (10 to 12), Information and Communication (13 to 15) and Monitoring Activities (16 and 17). Examples are principle 8, which requires considering the potential for fraud, principle 11, general control activities over technology, and principle 17, evaluating and communicating deficiencies in a timely manner.
An effective system provides reasonable assurance of achieving objectives. It requires that each of the five components and relevant principles is present and functioning, and that the five components operate together in an integrated manner. When a major deficiency exists in a component, a relevant principle or the way they operate together, the organization cannot conclude that it has met the requirements.
No framework is named in the statute. SEC rules require management to base its evaluation of ICFR on a suitable, recognized control framework established through due process and public comment (17 CFR 240.13a-15(c)), and PCAOB AS 2201.05 requires the auditor to use the same framework. PCAOB standards describe the COSO framework as suitable and available, and the audit report templates cite it as an example of control criteria.
COSO publishes a free executive summary and FAQ on coso.org. The full Framework and Appendices are sold by COSO as an eBook or softcover, and requests to reprint or use portions go through COSO's copyright permission request form. SmartSuite links to the publication and does not reproduce it.

Put this framework to work in SmartSuite
Manage controls, risks, evidence, and audits in one platform designed for modern governance, risk, and compliance.


