- ClassificationCategoryPayment SecurityDomainCybersecurityFramework FamilyPCI Security Standards
- Regulatory ContextTypeAssessment / Maturity ModelLegal InstrumentStandardSectorFinancial SectorIndustryPayment & FinTech
- Region / PublisherRegionGlobalRegion DetailGlobalPublisherPayment Card Industry Security Standards Council (PCI SSC)
- VersioningVersionv4.0.1 SAQ D for Service Providers, Revision 2 (January 2025)Effective DateJanuary 1, 2025 (the only SAQs accepted after PCI DSS v4.0 retired on December 31, 2024)Issue DateJanuary 2025 (Revision 2; first v4.0.1 edition October 15, 2024)
- AdoptionAdoption ModelIndustry RequirementImplementation ComplexityHigh
- Official ReferenceOpen Link in New TabSource
License included / downloadable: Yes
The PCI Security Standards Council publishes SAQ D for Service Providers in its Document Library; the PDF is free to download after the Council's license agreement is accepted.
Framework text is licensed by its publisher and is included only where stated above.
- SAQ D for Service Providers is the only PCI DSS v4.0.1 SAQ a service provider may use, validating against every requirement.
- It adds Appendix A1 for multi-tenant service providers and Appendix A2, and the current text is Revision 2 of January 2025.
- Section 2a asks for network diagrams, a table of every account data store, in-scope components, and twelve months of quarterly ASV scan results.
- Every requirement carries a Describe Results box in which the provider explains how its testing and evidence support the response.
- It includes the additional requirements PCI DSS marks for service providers only, such as 3.6.1.1, 8.2.3, 10.7.1, and 12.9.1.
Overview
PCI DSS v4.0.1 Self-Assessment Questionnaire D for Service Providers is the only SAQ a service provider may use: it applies to all service providers that a payment brand defines as eligible to complete a self-assessment, and it validates against every requirement of PCI DSS v4.0.1, with Appendix A1 for multi-tenant service providers and Appendix A2 added. The current text is Revision 2 of January 2025; the first v4.0.1 edition came out with the other SAQs on October 15, 2024, and since January 1, 2025 the v4.0.1 SAQs are the only ones accepted, PCI DSS v4.0 having retired on December 31, 2024. The SAQ is a validation form with an Attestation of Compliance (AOC), not a standard.
What sets the service provider form apart is the evidence it demands. Section 2a, Details about Reviewed Environment, asks for network diagrams, a table of every data store holding account data, the in-scope system component types and the last twelve months of quarterly ASV scan results, and Section 2b adds a Describe Results box to every requirement in which the provider briefly explains how its testing and evidence support the response. The form also contains the items PCI DSS marks as additional requirements for service providers only, such as 3.6.1.1, 8.2.3, 10.7.1, 11.4.6, 12.4.1, 12.9.1 and 12.9.2.
The two revisions since October 2024 are errata: Revision 1 (December 2024) corrected a requirement number reference in Requirement 3.6.1.1, and Revision 2 (January 2025) corrected the date of that change in the Document Changes table and made the table of contents clickable. Earlier, the April 2022 edition for v4.0 introduced Section 2a and the Describe Results column, and the August 2023 revision added the Part 2g section that explains Not Tested and Not Applicable responses.
Why does it matter?
Service providers hold, or can affect, the account data of many merchants at once, so the Council gives them no shortcut: SAQ D for Service Providers is the only SAQ option for service providers (Service Provider Eligibility Criteria). It asks for more than a merchant SAQ in three ways: a scope declaration per service in Part 2a, the environment evidence of Section 2a, and a written description of results for every requirement. It also carries the service-provider-only requirements, including the Requirement 12.9.1 obligation to give customers written acknowledgment of responsibility for the account data the provider stores, processes or transmits on their behalf, and Appendix A1 for providers whose customers share infrastructure.
Key benefits include:
- One SAQ, no eligibility test
Any service provider that a payment brand deems eligible to self-assess uses this form; the question is not which SAQ but whether a Report on Compliance is required instead.
- Scope declared per service
Part 2a lists the services included and excluded, by type (hosting, managed services, payment processing, payment gateway or switch and others), and Part 2g is completed once for each service assessed, with a Justification for Approach for every Not Applicable or Not Tested answer.
- Environment evidence up front
Section 2a collects network diagrams, the storage-of-account-data table with encryption and access logging per data store, any sensitive authentication data storage, in-scope system component types with counts and vendors, and the quarterly ASV scans with Attestations of Scan Compliance.
- Results described, not just ticked
The Service Provider Required Reporting column requires a brief description of how testing and evidence demonstrate each response, including which aspect a compensating control covered and why any requirement was excluded.
- Multi-tenant controls included
Appendix A1 is answered in full: logical separation (A1.1.1), per-customer access (A1.1.2, A1.1.3), penetration testing of separation at least once every six months (A1.1.4), per-customer audit logs (A1.2.1), forensic support (A1.2.2) and secure incident reporting with remediation per 6.3.1 (A1.2.3).
How does it work?
Section 1 is Parts 1 and 2 of the AOC: the assessed entity and assessor (1a, 1b), Scope Verification (2a), how the business handles account data and can otherwise affect its security (2b), the environment and segmentation (2c), in-scope locations (2d), PCI SSC validated products in use (2e), third-party service providers, to which Requirement 12.8 applies (2f), and the Summary of Assessment (2g) with rows for Requirements 1 to 12, Appendix A1 and Appendix A2. The five completion steps then follow: confirm that SAQ D is the only SAQ option, confirm scope, assess, complete Sections 1, 2a, 2b and 3, and submit the SAQ and AOC with any requested documentation to the payment brand or acquirer.
Section 2b mirrors the PCI DSS wording for all twelve requirements with Expected Testing and the same five responses as the merchant form (In Place and In Place with CCW, Not Applicable, Not Tested, Not in Place), each followed by the Describe Results box. Not Applicable must be verified and explained in Appendix C. Not Tested covers requirements excluded without consideration, for instance a physical storage provider confirming only the Requirement 9 controls for its facility; each is explained in Appendix D and makes the assessment Partial. Compensating controls need the Appendix B worksheet; a legal restriction is reported as Not in Place with the statute or regulation described; the customized approach is not supported in any SAQ.
Appendix A1 applies to multi-tenant service providers, which PCI DSS describes as providers whose customers share system resources, infrastructure, applications or databases; providers of shared data center space alone are not covered. Appendix A2 holds A2.1.2, a Risk Mitigation and Migration Plan for providers with connection points to POS POI terminals using SSL or early TLS, and A2.1.3, a secure service offering; Appendix A3 applies only to designated entities. Section 3 records Full or Partial, the compliance status, the acknowledgement that SAQ D Version 4.0.1 was completed per its instructions, the executive officer signature, QSA and ISA roles and, on request, a Part 4 action plan with rows for Requirements 1 to 12, A1 and A2.
Key Elements
- Service Provider Eligibility Criteria
Applies to all service providers defined by a payment brand as eligible to complete an SAQ; the only SAQ option for service providers.
- Part 2a: Scope Verification
Services included and not included in the assessment, by category, with an explanation for anything excluded; Part 2b describes how the provider can impact customer account data.
- Section 2a: Details about Reviewed Environment
Network diagrams, storage of account data and SAD, in-scope system component types, quarterly ASV scan results for the last twelve months and the Attestations of Scan Compliance.
- Section 2b: Requirements 1 to 12 with Describe Results
The full PCI DSS requirement set, each with a required description of testing and evidence, including the service-provider-only items 3.6.1.1, 3.7.9, 8.2.3, 8.3.10, 8.3.10.1, 10.7.1, 11.4.6, 11.5.1.1, 12.4.1, 12.4.2, 12.4.2.1, 12.5.2.1, 12.5.3, 12.9.1 and 12.9.2.
- Appendix A1: multi-tenant service providers
A1.1, protect and separate all customer environments and data; A1.2, facilitate logging and incident response for all customers.
- Appendix A2 and Appendix A3
A2.1.2 and A2.1.3 for providers connected to POS POI terminals on SSL or early TLS; A3 (Designated Entities Supplemental Validation) only when a payment brand or acquirer designates the entity.
- Section 3 and Part 4
Full or Partial; the status chosen from Compliant, Non-Compliant and Compliant but with Legal exception; executive officer attestation and the action plan covering Requirements 1 to 12, A1 and A2.
What does it cover?
The form covers every service provider that stores, processes or transmits account data on behalf of others, or that can affect the security of customer account data, and that a payment brand allows to validate by self-assessment rather than by a Report on Compliance. The categories in Part 2a show the breadth: hosting providers (including multi-tenant service providers and 3-D Secure hosting), managed services such as systems security and terminal management, payment processing by channel, payment gateways and switches, clearing and settlement, issuer processing, fraud and chargeback, loyalty, billing, records management and others. Each service is scoped, assessed and summarized separately in Part 2g. Merchants cannot use this SAQ; they have SAQ D for Merchants and the shorter merchant questionnaires.
What are its objectives?
The questionnaire is built so that a service provider can demonstrate that:
The services assessed, and those left out, are stated plainly in Part 2a, with one Part 2g summary per service.
The environment is documented before testing: diagrams, data stores, component types and twelve months of ASV scans in Section 2a.
Every requirement, including the service-provider-only items, has a response and a written description of the evidence behind it (Section 2b).
Customers receive the written acknowledgment of responsibility that Requirement 12.9.1 requires, and multi-tenant customers are separated, logged and supported under Appendix A1.
An executive officer attests the outcome in Part 3b and any Non-Compliant requirement carries a remediation date in Part 4.
Framework in Context
SAQ D for Service Providers mirrors PCI DSS v4.0.1 (June 2024) and sits beside the Report on Compliance completed with a Qualified Security Assessor; the choice between them belongs to the payment brands and acquirers that run the compliance programs. It is also the document merchants rely on when reviewing their providers: the Attestation of Compliance it produces is what a merchant checks under Requirement 12.8.4 when monitoring a provider's PCI DSS status at least once every 12 months, and 12.8.5 asks both parties to record which requirements each manages. Requirements 12.8 and 12.9 define that relationship, and the Appendix A1 overview adds that each customer of a multi-tenant provider remains responsible for its own compliance.
Common Framework Mappings
Service providers usually answer several assurance programs at once, so they map the SAQ D requirements, Appendix A1 and Appendix A2 to the controls, owners and evidence they already maintain, and reuse them for the annual attestation and for customer due diligence. The list below is indicative; the payment brand or acquirer evaluates the completed SAQ and AOC, not the mapping.
Mapped frameworks include:
CIS Controls v8.1
COBIT 2019
FedRAMP Rev. 5
HIPAA
ISO 27001:2022
ISO 27002:2022
NIST CSF 2.0
NIST 800-53 Rev.5
SOC 2
How SmartSuite Supports PCI DSS v4.0.1 SAQ D for Service Providers
SmartSuite provides the system for managing controls, evidence, mappings, assessments, and reporting.
Use Compliance Management to centralize all twelve requirements, Appendix A1 and Appendix A2 with controls, testing, evidence and the described results; Third Party Risk Management to assess and monitor the providers listed in Part 2f and to hold the customer-facing acknowledgments of Requirement 12.9.1; and Cyber & IT Risk to track vulnerabilities, ASV scan findings and the security controls that address them.
Service Scope Register (Part 2a)
One record per service with its category, whether it is included in the assessment, the reason for any exclusion and its own Part 2g summary.
Environment Evidence (Section 2a)
Store the network diagrams, the account data storage table with encryption and logging per data store, system component types with counts and vendors, and the quarterly ASV scan records.
Requirement and Results Register (Section 2b)
One record per requirement with the response, the Describe Results text, evidence and the Appendix C or D explanation where needed, with the service-provider-only items flagged.
Multi-Tenant Controls (Appendix A1)
Track logical separation, per-customer access, the six-monthly separation penetration test, per-customer audit logs and the customer channel for reporting incidents and vulnerabilities.
Customer Acknowledgments (12.9.1 and 12.8.5)
Use Third Party Risk Management to hold the written agreements that acknowledge responsibility for customer account data and the record of which requirements the provider, the customer or both manage.
Attestation and Action Plan (Section 3 and Part 4)
Dashboard of Full or Partial status, requirements Not in Place, remediation dates by requirement and appendix, and the submission to the payment brand or acquirer.
Related frameworks

CIS Controls v8.1 is a prioritized set of 18 Controls and 153 Safeguards, in three Implementation Groups, with a new Govern function.

HITRUST CSF v11.5.0 (April 2025) is HITRUST's certifiable security and privacy framework: 14 control categories, e1, i1 and r2 assessments; superseded by v11.9.0.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 specifies requirements for an information security management system: Clauses 4 to 10, risk treatment, the Statement of Applicability and 93 Annex A controls.

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 is the reference set of 93 information security controls in four themes, with attributes and implementation guidance, that supports an ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS.

NIST CSF 2.0 (CSWP 29, February 26, 2024) is the voluntary cybersecurity framework with six Functions including Govern, 22 Categories, 106 Subcategories, Profiles and Tiers.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 is the NIST catalog of security and privacy controls in 20 families, mandatory for federal systems under OMB A-130 and FISMA; Release 5.2.0 issued August 27, 2025.
Frequently Asked Questions For PCI DSS v4.0.1 SAQ D for Service Providers (Comprehensive Cardholder Data Security Controls)
No. The Service Provider Eligibility Criteria state that SAQ D for Service Providers applies to all service providers defined by a payment brand as eligible to complete an SAQ and that it is the only SAQ option for service providers; the first completion step repeats this. The alternative is not a shorter SAQ but a Report on Compliance with a Qualified Security Assessor, and the payment brands and acquirers decide which route a provider must take.
Section 2a, Details about Reviewed Environment, asks for network diagrams showing all connections to the cardholder data environment and the security controls at each boundary; a table of every database, file or other data store holding account data, with the elements stored, how they are secured and how access is logged; whether sensitive authentication data is stored after authorization or for issuer functions; a list of in-scope system component types with counts, vendors and roles; and the quarterly ASV scans of the last twelve months with any failed scans and rescans, plus the Attestations of Scan Compliance. The April 2022 edition added this section for service provider self-assessments.
Multi-tenant service providers, which PCI DSS describes as third-party service providers whose customers share system resources, infrastructure, applications or databases; providers offering only shared data center space are excluded. A1.1 requires logical separation between provider and customers (A1.1.1), per-customer access to its own cardholder data and environment (A1.1.2) and resources (A1.1.3), and penetration testing of the separation controls at least once every six months (A1.1.4); A1.2 requires audit log capability per customer (A1.2.1), support for forensic investigations (A1.2.2) and a secure channel for customers to report incidents and vulnerabilities, remediated per Requirement 6.3.1 (A1.2.3). A1.1.1 and A1.1.4 were best practice until March 31, 2025.
Both are errata. Revision 1 (December 2024) corrected a requirement number reference in Requirement 3.6.1.1, a service-provider-only item. Revision 2 (January 2025) corrected the date recorded for that change in the Document Changes table and made the table of contents clickable. The requirement content is that of the October 2024 edition, which aligned the SAQ with PCI DSS v4.0.1 and added the ASV Resource Guide to its resource list.
Section 2b gives every requirement a Service Provider Required Reporting instruction: briefly describe how the testing and evidence demonstrate that the requirement is In Place or Not in Place, which aspect a compensating control covered, the testing that shows a requirement is Not Applicable, or why a requirement was excluded as Not Tested. The Document Changes table records that the column was added in April 2022 so that service providers describe their testing results; merchant SAQs do not have it.

Put this framework to work in SmartSuite
Manage controls, risks, evidence, and audits in one platform designed for modern governance, risk, and compliance.


