- ClassificationCategoryCybersecurityDomainCybersecurityFramework FamilyOther
- Regulatory ContextTypeControl FrameworkLegal InstrumentFrameworkSectorFinancial SectorIndustryFinancial Services
- Region / PublisherRegionMiddle EastRegion DetailSaudi ArabiaPublisherSaudi Central Bank (SAMA), formerly the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority
- VersioningVersionVersion 1.0 (May 2017)Effective DateMay 24, 2017Issue DateMay 24, 2017
- AdoptionAdoption ModelRegulatory ComplianceImplementation ComplexityHigh
- Official ReferenceOpen Link in New TabSource
License included / downloadable: Yes
SAMA publishes the Cyber Security Framework on the SAMA Rulebook, where the full text and the original PDF are available to the public.
Framework text is licensed by its publisher and is included only where stated above.
- The SAMA Cyber Security Framework (May 2017) is mandatory for banks, insurers, financing companies, and credit bureaus regulated by the Saudi Central Bank.
- SAMA issued it under Circular No. 381000091275 dated May 24, 2017, and the SAMA Rulebook lists it as in force.
- It has four domains and 32 subdomains, each with a principle, an objective, and numbered control considerations.
- Implementation is measured against a six-level maturity model; unmet controls need compensating controls, risk acceptance, and a SAMA waiver.
- The board carries ultimate responsibility, and a full-time CISO of Saudi nationality is appointed.
Overview
The SAMA Cyber Security Framework is the mandatory cybersecurity framework for financial institutions regulated by the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA, formerly the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority): all banks, insurance and reinsurance companies, financing companies and credit bureaus operating in Saudi Arabia, and the financial market infrastructure (section 1.4). SAMA issued it under Circular No. 381000091275 dated 28/8/1438H, corresponding to May 24, 2017; the SAMA Rulebook lists it as in force, with a scope of application covering the banking sector, finance sector, payment systems and payment services providers, credit bureaus and the regulatory sandbox. Section 1.5 states that the framework is mandated by SAMA and that member organizations are responsible for adopting and implementing it.
The framework is structured around four main domains, Cyber Security Leadership and Governance (3.1), Cyber Security Risk Management and Compliance (3.2), Cyber Security Operations and Technology (3.3) and Third Party Cyber Security (3.4), divided into 32 numbered subdomains, each stating a principle, an objective and uniquely numbered control considerations (section 2.1). It is principle-based: where a control consideration cannot be implemented, the member organization considers compensating controls, an internal risk acceptance and a formal waiver from SAMA (section 2.2). Implementation is measured against a six-level maturity model, and member organizations should operate at maturity level 3 or higher (section 2.4).
Member organizations complete a periodic self-assessment questionnaire that SAMA reviews and audits to determine compliance and maturity (section 2.3). The framework draws on SAMA requirements and industry standards including NIST, ISF, ISO, BASEL and PCI (section 1.1), supersedes the earlier SAMA cybersecurity circulars listed in Appendix A, and is maintained under version control, with the preceding version retired whenever a new one is published (section 1.8). The Rulebook lists a single version; the 'v1.0' label comes from the original PDF.
Why does it matter?
The framework is mandated by SAMA, which owns it and updates it, while member organizations are responsible for adopting and implementing it (section 1.5), and the Saudi Central Bank alone interprets its principles, objectives and control considerations (section 1.6). Its requirements reach into governance: the board carries ultimate responsibility for cyber security (section 3.1), a full-time CISO of Saudi nationality is appointed with SAMA's no objection (3.1.1, control 9), the cyber security function is independent of the IT function (3.1.1, control 6), and SAMA approval is needed before material outsourcing (3.4.2) and before cloud services are used (3.4.3). SAMA uses the framework to assess maturity and to compare member organizations with each other (section 1.1).
Key benefits include:
- A common approach across the sector
Section 1.1 states the framework's three objectives: a common approach to cyber security within member organizations, an appropriate maturity level of controls, and cyber security risks that are properly managed throughout each organization.
- Maturity that can be measured
The six-level model in section 2.4 defines each level with criteria, from level 0 (non-existent) to level 5 (adaptive); levels 3, 4 and 5 require all criteria of the preceding levels, and SAMA expects level 3 or higher.
- Board-level governance
A board-mandated cyber security committee headed by an independent senior manager from a control function, a charter with at least quarterly meetings and sufficient budget are control considerations under subdomain 3.1.1.
- Regulator expectations written into the controls
The controls state when SAMA must be informed or asked: medium or high classified incidents immediately (3.3.15), approval before launching a new electronic banking service (3.3.13), material outsourcing (3.4.2), and cloud services and data outside Saudi Arabia (3.4.3).
- A route for exceptions
A control that cannot be tailored or implemented is handled through compensating controls, internal risk acceptance and a formal waiver request to SAMA, following the process in Appendix D and the form in Appendix E (section 2.2).
How does it work?
Chapter 2 explains the structure. Each of the four domains contains subdomains focused on a specific topic; for each subdomain the framework states a principle that summarizes the required controls, an objective that describes their purpose, and control considerations, the mandated controls that should be considered, numbered uniquely and nested up to four levels (section 2.1). Member organizations are expected to embed the principles and achieve the objectives, with the control considerations giving direction. Section 1.7 names the audience: senior and executive management, business owners, owners of information assets, CISOs and those who define, implement and review cyber security controls.
Maturity is measured on the section 2.4 model: level 0 non-existent, 1 ad-hoc, 2 repeatable but informal, 3 structured and formalized, 4 managed and measurable, 5 adaptive. Level 3 requires defined, approved and implemented controls, a documentation pyramid of board-endorsed policy, standards and procedures, monitored compliance and key performance indicators (section 2.4.1). Level 4 adds key risk indicators with thresholds and trend reporting (section 2.4.2, with additional requirements for banks under Circular No. 29814/67), and level 5 adds continuous improvement, integration with enterprise risk management and evaluation against peer and sector data (section 2.4.3).
Compliance is validated through a periodic self-assessment based on a questionnaire, which SAMA reviews and audits to determine the level of compliance and the maturity level (section 2.3). All domains apply to banks; for other financial institutions section 1.4 makes exceptions: alignment with the banking sector's cyber security strategy under 3.1.2 is mandatory only when applicable, subdomains 3.2.3 and 3.3.12 are excluded, and 3.3.13 is excluded except that multi-factor authentication is required where online customer services are offered. An organization that handles cardholder data or SWIFT services still implements PCI DSS or the SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework.
Key Elements
- 3.1 Cyber Security Leadership and Governance
Seven subdomains: 3.1.1 Cyber Security Governance, 3.1.2 Cyber Security Strategy, 3.1.3 Cyber Security Policy, 3.1.4 Cyber Security Roles and Responsibilities, 3.1.5 Cyber Security in Project Management, 3.1.6 Cyber Security Awareness and 3.1.7 Cyber Security Training.
- 3.2 Cyber Security Risk Management and Compliance
Five subdomains: 3.2.1 Cyber Security Risk Management (with 3.2.1.1 identification, 3.2.1.2 analysis, 3.2.1.3 response and 3.2.1.4 monitoring and review), 3.2.2 Regulatory Compliance, 3.2.3 Compliance with (Inter)national Industry Standards, 3.2.4 Cyber Security Review and 3.2.5 Cyber Security Audits.
- 3.3 Cyber Security Operations and Technology
Seventeen subdomains: 3.3.1 Human Resources, 3.3.2 Physical Security, 3.3.3 Asset Management, 3.3.4 Cyber Security Architecture, 3.3.5 Identity and Access Management, 3.3.6 Application Security, 3.3.7 Change Management, 3.3.8 Infrastructure Security, 3.3.9 Cryptography, 3.3.10 Bring Your Own Device, 3.3.11 Secure Disposal of Information Assets, 3.3.12 Payment Systems, 3.3.13 Electronic Banking Services, 3.3.14 Cyber Security Event Management, 3.3.15 Cyber Security Incident Management, 3.3.16 Threat Management and 3.3.17 Vulnerability Management.
- 3.4 Third Party Cyber Security
Three subdomains: 3.4.1 Contract and Vendor Management, 3.4.2 Outsourcing and 3.4.3 Cloud Computing, which applies to hybrid and public cloud services and not to private cloud.
- Cyber security maturity model (section 2.4)
Six levels from 0 to 5 with definitions and criteria in Table 1; member organizations should operate at level 3 or higher, and each higher level requires all criteria of the levels below it.
- Incident reporting to SAMA (3.3.15)
Member organizations inform SAMA IT Risk Supervision immediately of a medium or high classified incident, obtain its no objection before any media interaction, and submit a formal report after resuming operations covering the incident's classification, timing, assets, root cause, corrective actions, impact and costs.
- Cloud computing conditions (3.4.3)
A risk assessment and due diligence before adoption, SAMA approval before use or contract, data located in Saudi Arabia unless SAMA explicitly approves otherwise, logical segregation, audit and review rights, and return and irreversible deletion of data on exit.
- Appendices A to F
A lists the superseded SAMA circulars and the referenced payment, outsourcing and business continuity documents; B and C give the process and form for requesting an update; D and E give the waiver process and form; F is the glossary.
What does it cover?
The framework defines principles and objectives for initiating, implementing, maintaining, monitoring and improving cyber security controls in member organizations, and its controls apply to information assets from electronic and hardcopy information to applications, databases, ATMs, storage devices, premises and networks (section 1.3). It gives direction for member organizations and their subsidiaries, staff, third parties and customers; business continuity sits in the separate SAMA Business Continuity Minimum Requirements, and the non-cyber aspects of physical security and fraud management are outside it. Section 1.4 applies it to all banks, insurance and reinsurance companies, financing companies and credit bureaus operating in Saudi Arabia and to the financial market infrastructure; the Rulebook entry adds payment systems and payment services providers and the regulatory sandbox.
What are its objectives?
Section 1.1 states the objectives of the framework, and sections 1.2 and 2.4 add the security goals and the maturity target behind them:
To create a common approach for addressing cyber security within the member organizations (section 1.1).
To achieve an appropriate maturity level of cyber security controls within the member organizations, which section 2.4 sets at level 3 or higher.
To ensure cyber security risks are properly managed throughout the member organizations (section 1.1).
To protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information assets, the general security objectives defined in section 1.2.
To let SAMA periodically assess maturity, evaluate control effectiveness and compare member organizations with one another (section 1.1).
Framework in Context
The framework supersedes the SAMA circulars listed in Appendix A, among them the E-Banking Rules and the multi-factor authentication circular, and it refers onward to the SARIE Information Security Policy and the mada Rules and Standards Technical Book for payment systems (3.3.12), the Rules on outsourcing and the SAMA Business Continuity Framework. Subdomain 3.2.3 requires banks to comply with PCI DSS, the EMV technical standard and the SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework, and section 1.1 names NIST, ISF, ISO, BASEL and PCI as sources. Section 1.8 requires version control, with the preceding version retired when a new one is published; the Rulebook entry issued under Circular No. 381000091275 of May 24, 2017 is the version in force.
Common Framework Mappings
The SAMA Cyber Security Framework is commonly mapped to the international control sets below, several of which section 1.1 names among its sources, so that a member organization's control considerations and evidence can also answer its group or international assessments.
Mapped frameworks include:
CIS Controls v8.1
COBIT 2019
CSA CCM v4
ISO 27001:2022
ISO 27002:2022
NIST CSF 2.0
NIST 800-53 Rev.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1
SOC 2
How SmartSuite Supports SAMA CSF
SmartSuite provides the system for managing controls, evidence, mappings, assessments, and reporting.
Use Compliance Management for the 32 subdomains and their control considerations with owner and maturity level, Cyber & IT Risk for the central risk register and treatment plans that subdomain 3.2.1 requires, Third Party Risk Management for the 3.4 vendor, outsourcing and cloud requirements, and Internal Audit Management for the independent audits under 3.2.5.
Subdomain and Control Consideration Library
Load the 32 subdomains with their principle, objective and numbered control considerations (section 2.1), each with an owner, the applicable exceptions from section 1.4 and current status.
Maturity Self-Assessment
Score each subdomain on the 0 to 5 model, record the evidence for the level claimed and the gap to level 3 (section 2.4), and keep the questionnaire responses SAMA reviews and audits (section 2.3).
Cyber Security Risk Register
Hold identified risks in a central register (3.2.1.1), their likelihood and impact analysis (3.2.1.2), the treatment chosen and the risk owner's sign-off (3.2.1.3), and the treatment plan progress (3.2.1.4).
Waiver and Update Requests
Record each waiver request with the reason the control cannot be met, the compensating controls, CISO and committee approvals and SAMA's response (Appendix D and E), noting that the framework still applies while a request is pending.
Incident Register and SAMA Reporting
Classify incidents, log the immediate notice to SAMA IT Risk Supervision for medium or high incidents, and assemble the formal post-incident report fields a to k that subdomain 3.3.15 lists.
Third-Party, Outsourcing and Cloud Records
Track contract cyber security requirements and review rights (3.4.1), SAMA approvals for material outsourcing (3.4.2), and cloud approvals, data location and exit terms (3.4.3) per provider.
Related frameworks

COBIT 2019 is ISACA's framework for governing and managing enterprise IT, with 40 objectives in five domains, six governance principles and 11 design factors.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 specifies requirements for an information security management system: Clauses 4 to 10, risk treatment, the Statement of Applicability and 93 Annex A controls.

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 is the reference set of 93 information security controls in four themes, with attributes and implementation guidance, that supports an ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS.

NIST CSF 2.0 (CSWP 29, February 26, 2024) is the voluntary cybersecurity framework with six Functions including Govern, 22 Categories, 106 Subcategories, Profiles and Tiers.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 is the NIST catalog of security and privacy controls in 20 families, mandatory for federal systems under OMB A-130 and FISMA; Release 5.2.0 issued August 27, 2025.

PCI DSS v4.0.1 (June 2024) is the current Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard: twelve requirements, two validation approaches and the dates that retired v4.0.
Frequently Asked Questions For Saudi Arabia SAMA Cybersecurity Framework v1.0
Section 1.4 applies it to all banks, insurance and reinsurance companies, financing companies and credit bureaus operating in Saudi Arabia and to the financial market infrastructure; the Rulebook entry lists the banking sector, finance sector, payment systems and payment services providers, credit bureaus and the regulatory sandbox as its scope of application. Section 1.5 states that SAMA mandates the framework and that member organizations are responsible for adopting and implementing it. Non-bank institutions are exempt from subdomains 3.2.3, 3.3.12 and 3.3.13, with multi-factor authentication still required for online customer services.
Section 2.1 organizes it into four domains: 3.1 Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, 3.2 Cyber Security Risk Management and Compliance, 3.3 Cyber Security Operations and Technology and 3.4 Third Party Cyber Security. These contain 32 numbered subdomains, each with a principle, an objective and uniquely numbered control considerations that can nest up to four levels. The framework is principle-based (section 2.2), so the principles and objectives are what must be achieved and the control considerations give direction.
Section 2.4 defines six maturity levels: 0 non-existent, 1 ad-hoc, 2 repeatable but informal, 3 structured and formalized, 4 managed and measurable and 5 adaptive. Member organizations should operate at level 3 or higher, which means controls are defined, approved and implemented, documented in board-endorsed policies, standards and procedures, monitored for compliance and measured with key performance indicators (section 2.4.1). Level 4 adds key risk indicators and level 5 continuous improvement and peer comparison (sections 2.4.2 and 2.4.3).
Subdomain 3.3.15 requires the member organization to inform SAMA IT Risk Supervision immediately when a medium or high classified incident has occurred, to obtain SAMA's no objection before any media interaction about it, and to submit a formal incident report after resuming operations. The report covers the title and classification, the dates and times the incident occurred and was detected, the information assets involved, technical details, root-cause analysis, corrective activities performed and planned, a description of the impact, the estimated total cost and the estimated cost of corrective actions.
Yes, through the route section 2.2 describes. When a control consideration cannot be tailored or implemented, the member organization should consider compensating controls, pursue an internal risk acceptance and request a formal waiver from SAMA. Appendix D sets the process: a detailed description of why the control cannot be met and of the compensating controls, approval by the CISO and the cyber security committee, a request signed by the CISO and the business owner and sent through the CEO to the deputy governor of Supervision. The framework continues to apply until the waiver is granted.

Put this framework to work in SmartSuite
Manage controls, risks, evidence, and audits in one platform designed for modern governance, risk, and compliance.


